<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How To Secure Your Linksys Wireless Router With MAC Filtering</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.watchingthenet.com/secure-linksys-wireless-router-with-mac-filtering.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.watchingthenet.com/secure-linksys-wireless-router-with-mac-filtering.html</link>
	<description>Computer - Internet - Technology Tips And Tutorials</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 16:05:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: Rachael</title>
		<link>http://www.watchingthenet.com/secure-linksys-wireless-router-with-mac-filtering.html#comment-40363</link>
		<dc:creator>Rachael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Dec 2010 07:24:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.watchingthenet.com/secure-linksys-wireless-router-with-mac-filtering.html#comment-40363</guid>
		<description>Vahid is so right, mine had prevent and 3 intruder were on.  Don&#039;t even know when the came on, remove Saturday and one returned Wed morn at 12:08 AM</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Vahid is so right, mine had prevent and 3 intruder were on.  Don&#039;t even know when the came on, remove Saturday and one returned Wed morn at 12:08 AM</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: vahid</title>
		<link>http://www.watchingthenet.com/secure-linksys-wireless-router-with-mac-filtering.html#comment-24866</link>
		<dc:creator>vahid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 May 2010 04:53:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.watchingthenet.com/secure-linksys-wireless-router-with-mac-filtering.html#comment-24866</guid>
		<description>well, let me coment on the main topic. mac filter with linksys does not work when you mac addresses over 20, and I have no idea why. if u choose &quot;permit&quot; the router will not let any computer in! if u choose &quot;prevent&quot; any pc will connect and work!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>well, let me coment on the main topic. mac filter with linksys does not work when you mac addresses over 20, and I have no idea why. if u choose &#034;permit&#034; the router will not let any computer in! if u choose &#034;prevent&#034; any pc will connect and work!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://www.watchingthenet.com/secure-linksys-wireless-router-with-mac-filtering.html#comment-23548</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 01:54:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.watchingthenet.com/secure-linksys-wireless-router-with-mac-filtering.html#comment-23548</guid>
		<description>As technology improves so do the replies to the thread. MAC filter is useless, non SSID broadcast is also useless.

The only way to secure a wireless network is,

- Use Wires instead
- WPA2-TLS</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As technology improves so do the replies to the thread. MAC filter is useless, non SSID broadcast is also useless.</p>
<p>The only way to secure a wireless network is,</p>
<p>- Use Wires instead<br />
- WPA2-TLS</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Commentstobillybob</title>
		<link>http://www.watchingthenet.com/secure-linksys-wireless-router-with-mac-filtering.html#comment-20825</link>
		<dc:creator>Commentstobillybob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 00:23:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.watchingthenet.com/secure-linksys-wireless-router-with-mac-filtering.html#comment-20825</guid>
		<description>I agree with you mostly Billybob, MAC Filter is a weak, and easy to evade protection for your network. However, setting up WPA(Wireless Protection Access) isn&#039;t the best security for your network. To get a good/solid protection as far as encryption then I recommend using AES(Advance Encryption Security); it weaves your password through an Algorithm about 7-8 times  making it extremely painful for hackers to figure out. Also, recommend, turning off your remote access, encryption your telnet and line console 0.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with you mostly Billybob, MAC Filter is a weak, and easy to evade protection for your network. However, setting up WPA(Wireless Protection Access) isn&#039;t the best security for your network. To get a good/solid protection as far as encryption then I recommend using AES(Advance Encryption Security); it weaves your password through an Algorithm about 7-8 times  making it extremely painful for hackers to figure out. Also, recommend, turning off your remote access, encryption your telnet and line console 0.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Billybob</title>
		<link>http://www.watchingthenet.com/secure-linksys-wireless-router-with-mac-filtering.html#comment-11710</link>
		<dc:creator>Billybob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 15:59:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.watchingthenet.com/secure-linksys-wireless-router-with-mac-filtering.html#comment-11710</guid>
		<description>This will only keep honest (or clueless) people out

Saying that you need weak layers like MAC filtering on top of real security like WPA is like saying that having a raincoat on over a bullet proof vest will add a layer of protection.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This will only keep honest (or clueless) people out</p>
<p>Saying that you need weak layers like MAC filtering on top of real security like WPA is like saying that having a raincoat on over a bullet proof vest will add a layer of protection.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic page generated in 0.579 seconds. -->
<!-- Cached page generated by WP-Super-Cache on 2012-02-09 22:22:02 -->

